Monday, December 24, 2018

'Public Health Care Policy Essay\r'

'The circuit card I have chosen to examine is consign H. R. 1983: States’ Medical marijuana Patient fortress Act. This nozzle was sponsored by Barney Frank from Massachusetts. This bill c altogethers for a rescheduling of hemp and to defer for each one disk operating systems ruling on its’ medical use. This bill would change federal laws to prohibit breeze through or harassment of patients prescribed marijuana in some(prenominal) situate that the state law al funkys.\r\nThere would be token(prenominal) address in implementing this bill as the federal politics is spending a large amount of funds to utilize this law as well as hold prisoners in facilities. Currently on that point is a conflict between about state and federal laws on the defeat of medical marijuana. According to PopVox.com in that respect ar currently no organizations opposing this bill, magic spell it lists several organizations endorsing it. Currently the organizations endorsing thi s bill argon the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws, Marijuana insurance Project, the Drug Policy Alliance, Americans for Safe Access, Americans For Forfeiture Reform, and WinLiberty.\r\nThis bill, in my opinion, leave behind affect the wellness c atomic number 18 sparing greatly. If this bill passes it go forth, in essence, create a new do medicates for the medical world. Currently, patients that are prescribed marijuana are in danger of getting arrested or get at by the federal authorities whether the patients state laws forget it or not. This bill bequeath give power to the state. If this bill passes, it will bring a new medicate to the arena of medical do drugss without the cost of developing the drug. Most new drugs that enter the market place are patented to give motivator to pay graduate(prenominal) costs for research and development, while marijuana has already been created, researched, and developed. The rampart to foundation will be low as m arijuana is low in cost to grow and is in postgraduate bring.\r\nIf H.R. 1983 passes, the public living in states that allow medical marijuana will be free of fear of punishment of the federal governing body, which will discredit the â€Å" damage” of universe prescribed marijuana in allowing states. The demand for marijuana would cast up and lead to an increase in ply. It would en suitable the market to isotropy itself out to the equilibrium of supply and demand. Since there is no patent on the drug, barriers to entry would be minimal.\r\nWith the cost so richly to sell and buy marijuana for any use, other substitutes for marijuana are able to increase their bells. The demand is high for distressingness management, appetite enhancers, as well as anxiety medicine leading to high prices for drugs such as Valium, Vicodin, Lortab, Percocet , and others which marijuana has been shown to be used for substitutes. If the government would allow states to overlook on the legality of marijuana, the drug would constitute easier to buy and sell in genuine states.\r\nThis would lead to lower barriers to entry and cost of selling bringing prices down for all marijuana substitutes. Currently, the federal government is unnaturally holding back the supply of the drug and the buyers, leading to exsanguinous weight loss. This constitution will allow those who would like to supply the drug but don’t want to pay the high price to enter the market and lower the price that consumers have to pay to buy marijuana. The government will also save gold currently being spent on holdment of marijuana control.\r\nI believe the government is being asked to pass this bill because consumers, sellers, and the government benefit from this bill being passed; lower costs for all three, lessening dead weight loss, and increasing income toward the government in sales tax. The losers in this bill could perhaps be suppliers of marijuana substitutes. They will be forced to lower their prices to compensate for high supply of their drugs substitute.\r\nThere could possibly be many externalities of the legalization of marijuana. With marijuana having a lower cost, cigar and cigarette smokers could move to green goddess marijuana instead of tobacco. Fines may be created for driving under the influence of the drug as we have with alcohol. There would be more research toward marijuana for the health risks and benefits. Based on my analysis of this bill, I see more positive effectuate than negative. There would most likely be other externalities that have not been listed, and there may be other issues of drug control that would have to be implemented. In my opinion, giving the states’ rights to legalize or enforce control is a cheaper more effectual way to manage the market for marijuana.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment